Board Training That Actually Fits Your Board


Hi!

I want to tell you about something that happened last week that reinforced why I do this work the way I do (and how I accomplish my work as well).

A client needed board training. Not the cookie-cutter, here's-your-binder-good-luck variety. Real training, as in:

  • How do we run an annual review process for our executive director?
  • We need to learn how to read financials without glazing over!
  • What's our actual role in fundraising?
  • How do we onboard new members so they don't spend a year figuring out what's happening?
  • What does good governance look like when we're not in crisis mode?

I could have cobbled something together on my own, or sent them a bunch of links to check out.

But, I'm not a finance expert, and I'm not a governance wonk.

So, instead of pretending to be and know everything, I partnered with two consultants who are excellent at what they do.

​Perry Radford of Rad Philanthropy handled finances and fundraising training.

​Stephen Newland from MoneyPath led governance and onboarding.

I coordinated and filled in the succession planning and transition pieces, and added a section on equitable nominations and training for new board members, especially folks with lived experience.

The result?

Training that was sharp, relevant, and designed for this board's actual needs—not a generic deck we've all seen before.


I'm excited about a new partnership: Christal Cherry of The Board Pro and I are teaming up to deliver some potent in-person training opportunities! Christal specializes in board search and intensive training work. If you're tired of surface-level one-size-fits-all, and want something transformational, we're building that.

As Christal and I put the finishing touches on this body of work, please hit reply and let me know if your board needs training! Let's talk and support a design of something that truly fits YOUR org's / board's needs. Training that addresses your organization's specific gaps and gets your board ready to actually govern.

​

The larger point here is this: Good consulting means knowing what you're great at, and partnering for the rest. Your board (and your org) deserves trainers who actually know their stuff, and/or trainers with a cadre of professionals in their network to pull in as needed.

I'm thrilled and thankful to have such a cadre of incredible folks.

Gravel Road, Chattahoochee Hills, GA 30213
​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Leaving Well in the Workplace

Your Leaving Well guide to navigating workplace transitions 🧡 I normalize workplace transitions one organization + person at a time. Leaving Well is the art + practice of leaving in the workplace, with intention + joy.

Read more from Leaving Well in the Workplace

You probably use the word "stakeholder" dozens of times a week. In proposals, meetings, strategic plans. It feels neutral, professional, standard. It's not. The term comes from literally driving stakes into land to claim it—to forcibly mark indigenous territory as someone else's property. Every time we use it casually in our sector, we're invoking the language of dispossession. I just released a podcast episode with Austen Smith and Julie McFarland diving into why this matters and what to do...

Two magazines sit on the counter. One is closed showing the cover, and the other is open to an article titled "Effective Board Transitions"

I recently published an article on board succession planning in Community Association Institute's Common Ground magazine's November/December edition. The article was written specifically for homeowners associations and community association boards—the volunteer leaders who govern neighborhoods, condos, and planned communities. But like so many other topics, there is nothing in that article for community association boards that departs from the advice I'd give to nonprofit board members. The...

This week's Leaving Well podcast features Katya Fels Smyth, who just did what most nonprofit leaders think is impossible: she wound down the Full Frame Initiative after 15 years — proactively, with integrity, and in partnership with her community. Not because she had to, but because staying wasn't serving the mission anymore. Who gets to decide they're leaving? What are the implications? Who's left holding the bag? These aren't just operational questions. They're power and justice questions....