Mythbusters: top three things nonprofit boards misunderstand about interim leadership.


Myth No. 1: Interims have a disadvantage because you're not "from here". ​
​
I hear it all of the time:

  • You're not from here, so how would you form relationships?
  • How much do you know about our specific mission and community?

In my opinion, being an outsider isn't a limitation—it's actually where the value begins. Fresh eyes from an interim leader surface opportunities and address challenges that have become normalized within your culture. Not only that, but the best interim leaders also function as method actors. Trust me, your community won't know that your really great interim has only been with the org for a few weeks! Not only that, but for 85% of my interim clients, I travel 1-2 times per month to be onsite with the team, and the rest of my work is delivered remotely -- and it's impactful!
​
​Myth No. 2: An interim simply is a "rear end in the seat", holding the ship steady. ​
​
Strong interim leaders focus on scorecards and transformation, not just steadiness. We work to establish clear metrics, transparent dashboards, and decision frameworks (gosh, don't get me started on decision making in orgs) that respect governance boundaries while driving progress, and staying mission focused.
​
​Myth No. 3: An interim can't be a bridge builder.
​
The most valuable interim work actually takes place when there's disconnect between board vision and organizational capacity. As an objective third party, powerful interims can deliver hard truths and translate between perspectives without the baggage of internal politics.

Not all interim leaders share my same opinions and frameworks, and ... not every organization is positioned for interim success! Red flags that I keep an eye open for when taking on interim client orgs include:
​
🚩 Power hoarding
🚩 Inability / unwillingness to delegate
🚩 Absence of clear strategic priorities
🚩 Budget gymnastics
​
The most successful engagements function as a well-structured relationship: consistent, confidential, and focused on alignment. Interim leadership isn't just about filling a vacancy—it's about transforming a gap into a launching pad for your organization's next chapter.
​
💡 What questions do you have about making interim leadership work effectively?
​
While my 2025 calendar for Interim ED / CEO work is now fully booked, we still have space for folks ready to begin work on succession plans, or who want to plan ahead for 2026 (whether that's because your org has upcoming sabbaticals or planned leaves).

​Check out our website, or hit reply and let's chat.

​Unsubscribe · Preferences​

Leaving Well in the Workplace

Your Leaving Well guide to navigating workplace transitions 🧡 I normalize workplace transitions one organization + person at a time. Leaving Well is the art + practice of leaving in the workplace, with intention + joy.

Read more from Leaving Well in the Workplace

(that email we just sent didn't have the promised video link - oops!) Leadership transitions are inevitable—but silence isn't strategy. In this video, I share why naming change early and honestly can actually build deeper donor trust, not weaken it. 💬 Closing Reflection Questions: For nonprofit staffers: What assumptions do you think your donors hold about leadership transitions? For funders: When has transparency (or the lack of it) changed how you felt about an organization? (Hit reply, I'd...

Most orgs plan carefully for how people join the board… but not for how they leave. I know, I know -- I'm a broken record on this topic. In this video below, I offer a few practical action steps / practices for offboarding board members with intention and care—because how someone leaves matters just as much as how they served. Offboarding is the often-ignored half of board culture, but a thoughtful exit process supports continuity, legacy, and dignity. It's not super easy to SEE this in your...

The headlines focused on Omaha electing its first Black mayor. But buried in the coverage was a big lesson in transition planning that every nonprofit should study. When John Ewing Jr. defeated a three-term incumbent mayor, he faced a choice: bring in his own team or work with what he inherited. He chose continuity. He retained every department head and senior staffer except one who was already retiring. His explanation cuts to the heart of succession planning: "What I've found in transitions...